Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 11:07 +0200 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:39:39AM +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote: > > > I'd rather say that generally binary packages split words at '-', so if > > > you've a choice among these two the latter is preferable. > > > > If this is so, then browserplugin-* should content everyone. > > I'm sure you meant "browser-plugin-*" here ...
Hm, browserplugin-* would be a new option. Then we would have
1. browser-plugin-*
2. browserplugin-*
3. *-browserplugin
4. *-browser-plugin
I think all of these would work (with a slight preference to 1. or 2.).
Opinions?
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
