Frank Lin PIAT <fp...@klabs.be> writes: > Shouldn't we suggest/require that the descriptions in ITP bugs > includes the intended description for the package? (as opposed to a > mere copy of upstream description)
This has been mentioned a number of times over the years, and it's still a good idea IMO. > Current ITP look likes this: […] > > (Include the long description here.) > > I suggest to replace the last line with: > > > (Include the intended long description of the package here.) Perhaps be even more explicit: (Include the intended long description of the Debian package here.) > Voilà, > > Franklin Thanks for pursuing this. -- \ “Odious ideas are not entitled to hide from criticism behind | `\ the human shield of their believers' feelings.” —Richard | _o__) Stallman | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k4s4j2r6....@benfinney.id.au