Frank Lin PIAT <[email protected]> writes:
> Shouldn't we suggest/require that the descriptions in ITP bugs
> includes the intended description for the package? (as opposed to a
> mere copy of upstream description)
This has been mentioned a number of times over the years, and it's still
a good idea IMO.
> Current ITP look likes this:
[…]
> > (Include the long description here.)
>
> I suggest to replace the last line with:
>
> > (Include the intended long description of the package here.)
Perhaps be even more explicit:
(Include the intended long description of the Debian package here.)
> Voilà,
>
> Franklin
Thanks for pursuing this.
--
\ “Odious ideas are not entitled to hide from criticism behind |
`\ the human shield of their believers' feelings.” —Richard |
_o__) Stallman |
Ben Finney
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
