Russ Allbery a écrit : > "John H. Robinson, IV" <jaq...@debian.org> writes: >> Russ Allbery wrote: > >>> My understanding is that part (although certainly not all) of the >>> reason behind the default change is consistency with the kfreebsd >>> architectures which are expected to be part of Debian. Debian has >>> needed to adapt to BSD behavior, non-standard or not, since the project >>> decided to include the kfreebsd architectures. That's part of porting.
This reasoning sounds very strange, the BSD porters haven't been consulted at all about that. I really doubt it is even part of reason behind the change. >> What is wrong with porting kfreebsd behaivour instead? > > I don't know. What do the BSD porters think about it? > In kfreebsd, it's also a value to change with sysctl, nothing very difficult. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bc569d1.9060...@aurel32.net
