On Sunday 11 April 2010 12:42:01 Wouter Verhelst wrote: > They don't *need* to do that. It can just be documented that if you use > IPv6, you need to use the v4-in-v6-mapped syntaxis.
IMHO i think that using the mapped syntax can bring some consistency rather than having logs and configuration files with two different kinds of addresses that should be treated differently by the program, when reading the configuration, and by the log analyser tools. And of course if a program handles IPv6, there will be the need to deal with IPv6 addresses in logs and configuration. Bye -- Salvo Tomaselli -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201004111536.29307.tipos...@tiscali.it
