On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:46:01AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Dienstag, 30. März 2010, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote: > > > squid! > > > (Or any other normal http proxy. I don't recommend any apt-proxy > > > solution...) > > Can you explain why? > > apt-proxy had issues when I tried (as well as others, which I cannot > rememeber > now), approx iirc requires to changes /etc/apt/sources list, squid always > worked for me and never had issues, squid is useful for more then just > proxying apt repositories, squid can be set up as a transparent proxy quite > easily, updating a full/partial mirror usually takes more bandwidth then just > using a proxy.
Among specific deb repos proxies, "people" seem to be happy with apt-cacher-ng (at least on debian-mirr...@ldo), and popcon confirms this impression (best progression): http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=apt-cacher-ng%2Capt-cacher%2Capprox%2Capt-proxy%2Cdebmirror%2Capt-mirror&show_vote=on&want_legend=on&want_ticks=on&beenhere=1 -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100331204738.gk1...@dedibox.ebzao.info
