On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Joerg Jaspert <jo...@debian.org> wrote:
> The only trouble this setup has is that you have a pretty huge expensive > machine always on and running, but not actually doing stuff for > 99.999999999999% of the time. And usually the support pack we ordered > provides a service that means getting machine back faster than this, so > the question in the end is: Do we want the added complexity (and costs), > or can we just stand a day or three of downtime? Its annoying, but world > doesnt really die. Hmmm, OK. There don't seem to be any other machines hosted in the same place so having another machine that is used for other stuff most of the time and also as a backup ftp-master during outages wouldn't work, for now at least. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/u2ne13a36b31003310113q11c0b00dw34e2a55971b2b...@mail.gmail.com
