On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 01:59, Ben Finney <ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > Luk Claes <l...@debian.org> writes: > >> There is currently discussion ongoing about how to move forward, >> though due to the complex nature of the current situation (where also >> lots of FUD etc is on the lists), it is being dealt in private. > > Nearly three months later, the issue remains: Python in Debian does not > have a maintainer who communicates in a timely manner on the > ‘debian-python’ forum. (This is evidenced by another ongoing discussion > about problems with the python2.6 transition, with no input from the > maintainer.) > > What is the specific plan to resolve that issue of maintainership, and > what has the past three months of private action achieved for its > resolution?
So, three months are passed since the last email to the original thread and 1 week from this last ping, and there are still no public information about the "currently discussion ongoing about how to move forward". Nice, let's keep this hidden, so that only the secret cabal knows about it, and the Debian community can be kept in the dark. Way to go. -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8b2d7b4d1003081100q385153c4kf34f43a9cac3d...@mail.gmail.com
