Le Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:39:40AM +0000, Philipp Kern a écrit : > On 2010-02-24, Joerg Jaspert <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > > Anyways, the thing is - data should be gathered where it belongs > > to (and is processed anyways). changelogs and other similar data > > actually are something the archive needs to process, so storage is > > easy. Things like UDD should not generate it, but merely be consumers, > > probably linking it to other sources (that have no place in ftpmaster). > > I agree with the "it should be generated where it's processed" part. We > buildd people would like to get access to live changelog by the way to > generate some mails. packages.debian.org is not sufficient for that > currently because we need it available when the packages are synced into > the wanna-build database.
Hello everybody, If the developments on changelog parsing introduce new requirements, in particular limitations on post-upload corrections, I strongly recommend to document this in our Policy. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100226004617.gb1...@kunpuu.plessy.org
