On 18/02/10 at 00:18 +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 22:47 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 16/02/10 at 22:27 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:13:06PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > - disk space on buildds: at least 2 GiB are required to build a kernel > > > > with debuginfo. (that doesn't sound too hard to satisfy) > > > > > > A typical build includes between 2 and 10 of them. > > > > Ah, I missed that. Provided the build of the different are sequential, > > the tree is not cleaned up between builds? > > > > So that means at most 20 GiB, which probably excludes more buildds. > > > > > > - mirror space: each debug .deb would use ~ 450 MB (see > > > > http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/l/linux/) > > > > > > Our archive does not support ddebs. > > > > Why couldn't it be done using a normal deb? > > Noob question... > > Aren't there some alternatives so people don't have to download all the > MegaBytes ? (iSCSI ; DRDB ; FUSE/HTTP... whatever) > Especially for fast moving targets, like unstable.
I's only a few hundreds of megabytes per kernel image. Some games or debug packages require more space than that. I don't think it's worth deploying an infrastructure just for that. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100218130119.gc9...@xanadu.blop.info
