On 2/16/10, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-02-16 18:55 +0100, Michael Gilbert wrote: > >>> all of these seem like rather complicated solutions. wouldn't it be a >>> bit simpler to ask for removal from both testing and unstable, then once >>> that happens, upload the old (known stable) version of the package? >> >> oh, you would probably need a conflicts with the newer version and a >> README.Debian to explain what to do for users with the new version >> already installed. > > Except that these users will never even see it if the version in the > archive is lower than the one they have installed. Your proposal seems > like a non-starter to me.
how about versioning it something like 1.3.1-1+reverted1.2.1? mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8e2a98be1002161021p25e2a651kb6866337a0123...@mail.gmail.com
