On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 19:50 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from DDPOMail robot <lu...@debian.org> ----- > > From: DDPOMail robot <lu...@debian.org> > To: Debian-Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org> > Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:08:13 +0000 > Subject: Possible problems in your Debian packages > > === phylip: > = No migration to testing for 155 days. > See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=phylip> > > I wonder why this package has problems because the link does not uncover > any reason why it is not (yet) builded on several architectures. One > reason might be that it is a non-free package - but it is not clear to > to me what I should do now.
There is not currently a full set of auto-builders for non-free. So far as I know, your only options at the moment are to request removal of the outdated binaries or build and upload for those architectures yourself. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
