Norbert Preining <prein...@logic.at> writes: > On Mo, 28 Dez 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> > Mind that git-buildpackage with normal 1.0 source format does NOT pollute >> > the git repository, so my expectation is that the 3.0 format does the >> > same, but alas, it doesn't. >> >> Well, if you have the usual quilt rules, you working copy is also modified >> until the next debian/rules clean. Here the clean doesn't unapply the > > I disagree: > > $ ls ~/.gbp.conf > ls: cannot access /home/norbert/.gbp.conf: No such file or directory > $ git status > # On branch master > nothing to commit (working directory clean) > $ git-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot -S > ... > dpkg-buildpackage: source only, diff-only upload (original source NOT > included) > Now running lintian... > Finished running lintian. > $ git status > # On branch master > nothing to commit (working directory clean) > $ > > So please tell me *what* has changed? > > Doing the same with source format 3.0 git status reports hundreds > of differences. > > So please do not spread things that are not correct!
He did say that with 3.0 (quilt) format the "clean" state is with patches applied, like you get after dpkg-source -x. That part is different to 1.0 format where "clean" would have patches unapplied. So when you go from 1.0 to 3.0 you will get a ton of files changed after the first build + clean because now patches are applied. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org