On 2010-01-01, Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> wrote: > * Philipp Kern: >>> That's false. You can use protocol-level gateways, which do NAT and PT >>> (protocol translation). >> Can you point me to one please? > There's DNS64 and BEHAVE, probably with some free implementation. Of > course, there are hardly any users because the entire IPv6 user base > is rather small, and we're talking about a renegade faction of that.
I wouldn't call them renegade, to be honest. I wondered back then how to achieve an IPv6-only network to check applications for compatibility, but missed the option to still connect to IPv4 hosts without the use of proxies. I don't care about the additional NAT layer because I'm NATed anyway. Thanks for those pointers, although the implementations seem to be missing (not for Windows but for others as it seems). > IOS has NAT-PT support, IIRC. It's also patent-encumbered. Oh ok, I just saw documents deprecating NAT-PT altogether, but I didn't know the latter. Thanks a lot, Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org