On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > In truth, my laptop *does not have an FQDN*. The concept has no useful > > It must have, POSIX provided a way for apps to query it, and apps started > doing that. So you need one. It will be an arbitrary one, but that's fine.
Better correct myself here. POSIX provides a way for apps to query the canonical host name, but DOES NOT REQUIRE IT TO BE A FQDN. So, it provided the notion of a "special name", the canonical host name. In practice, it has to be a FQDN, but that's due to bad usage by applications, not a POSIX (or SuSv3) requirement. And anything that depends on it to be unique in the whole world is broken. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
