Le jeudi 17 décembre 2009 20:48:50, Neil Williams a écrit : > DH_NO_ACT still needs debian/rules to be modified or else all debhelper > routines would be disabled; we need an option that is specific to > dh_config_model without having to edit debian/rules. > > I think DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS is still useful, whether or not > dh_config_model outputs the warning is neither here nor there for my > purposes.
ok. dh_config_model_upgrade will react to both variables. > The debconf maintainers aren't the cdebconf maintainers; it's not > unusual for someone else to step up as long as the interface in the > perl version is suitable for porting to C. So the real issue is that > config::model tries hard to make an interface that can be implemented > in another language. Hmm. The core part of Config::Model could be rewritten in C: I've avoided using too many Perl magic. The fact that the models are currently stored as Perl data structure is not a big problem. This was done just as a convenience to parse quickly the models. The models could as well be stored as YAML, JSON or XML and used as is in a C implementation of Config::Model. The Perl implementation would just have to translate JSON or YAML or XML back as Perl data structure to work as usual. All the best Dominique -- http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ddumont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
