On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 09:48:44PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 12:39:28PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > the right solution here would be to fix it so that it did, not to add > > it to Essential.
> On a side note, I thought the right solution was to integrate the ucf > functionality into dpkg. Any update on this, or was this just wishful > thinking on my part? I think there's ongoing work to support debconf prompting for conffiles, but I don't think there's movement on integrating ucf functionality into dpkg. ICBW, though. Of course, it's fine for this functionality to become Essential: yes by virtue of being the standard dpkg way of doing things. :) Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
