Eugene Gorodinsky <e.gorodin...@gmail.com> writes: > A while ago I participated in a discussion here about the debian > package format. Quite recently I tried to spark up a discussion about > package formats on the LSB list but did not get any replies
Can you point to the message (preferably via its Message-Id field) so we can see what it was saying? > hopefully this discussion will be more welcome here. Constructive > crticism is welcome, so feel free to critique. To be honest, I'm not sure what response you expect to get. There's not much substantive to respond to in your message: yes, it would be nice to have a common package format, but I don't see what in particular you're proposing be done about that. Such a discussion would IMO best be done at the freedesktop.org distribution collaboration forum <distributi...@lists.freedesktop.org>, to gather input from the various distributions. Perhaps you could post a more specific proposal there, and post here (and likely points in other distribution-specific discussion forums) inviting interested parties to join that thread. -- \ “It is wrong to think that the task of physics is to find out | `\ how nature *is*. Physics concerns what we can *say* about | _o__) nature…” —Niels Bohr | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
