On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:51:31PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes: > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:20:17PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:12:33PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > >>> === modified file 'policy.sgml' > >>> --- policy.sgml 2009-10-21 20:49:37 +0000 > >>> +++ policy.sgml 2009-10-31 01:10:42 +0000 > >>> @@ -1725,7 +1725,10 @@ > >>> <p> > >>> It must start with the line <tt>#!/usr/bin/make -f</tt>, > >>> so that it can be invoked by saying its name rather than > >>> - invoking <prgn>make</prgn> explicitly. > >>> + invoking <prgn>make</prgn> explicitly. That is, invoking > >>> + either of <tt>make -f debian/rules <em>args...</em></tt> > >>> + or <tt>./debian/rules <em>args...</em></tt> must cause > >>> + identical behaviour in each case. > >>> </p> > >>> > >>> <p> > > >> Seconded. > > > I'm not convinced this is necessary, but I think it would be better worded > > as: > > > That is, invoking either of [...] must result in identical behavior. > > I second the modification with this change, as I agree with Steve that > this reads a bit better.
I'm fine with either wording. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
