On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:18:57PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > There are architectures for different issues. There are issues which
> > allways need the fastest available architecture and there are other
> > needs which are targeting at low power consumption etc. We should
> > probably not put a large effort on a theoretical option which is never
> > used in real live (and I mean a reall *never* not only low chances).
>
> That is what I meant. There are users of openoffice.org on armel and
> mipsel, so it's not at all theoretical even if one would think
> differently from a first look.
That's actually *not* what I mean. I agree that there might be a use
for openoffice.org on any architecture. This general use applications
are exactly what I was *not* speaking about. But please let this settle
because the "find a bug" reason might be strong enough to make our
arguing void.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
