On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:20:49PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:05:47PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:45:04PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:43:19AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > > > > John Goerzen wrote: > > > > > Firefox/x.y.z Iceweasel/x.y.z > > > > > > Sounds too Firefoxy. > > > > What's the problem with that? I thought Iceweasel *was* Firefox for all > > practical purposes, modulo branding and usual distribution patches. > > Simply putting Firefox like that in the UA can sound like it is > Firefox. And we still don't have the right to use the Firefox name on > something that doesn't bear the Firefox logo.
I think this concern got addressed by other people (most notably Steve) elsewhere in the thread. The UA is an API and/or interface, and until MoCo actually starts acting against us using it, we should consider it like an unenforced software patent. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
