hi guys, On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:56:59PM +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > > To try making it a bit less ugly (and hard to type due to the moving > > nature of "-" as others have pointed out), I just try to mediate with > > "/vendor/". > > FWIW, I'm fine with /vendor.
personally, beyond the aesthetically displeasing name, i'm really
skeptical that this will accomplish anything useful.
* most apps require extra config and splitting out of stuff into other
directories for fhs compliance anyway, thus requiring some level of
webserver configuration, meaning this adds no benefit (beyond 1 line
fewer in the server config).
* this encourages a "working in unconfigured state" for packages, which
seems very sketchy wrt security (similarly, to apps dropping random
publically executable scripts in /usr/lib/cgi-bin.
tbh this seems closer to the "solution looking for a problem" rather than
the other way around.
sean
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
