On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 22:19 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Well, the issue raised in LKML is that you absolutely should *not* enable > -fstack-protector-all unless you _really_ know what you're doing, and most > certainly not by default. It has nothing to do with -fstack-protector, just > with -fstack-protector-all. But it does show that extra stack usage CAN > have bad effects on performance in pathological cases (which -all seems > to cause more readly :-p ). Isn't this what they've done starting with the 2.6.31 debian packages? CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL=y CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR=y
Should we bugreport this agains src:linux2.6 ? Cheers, Chris. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
