On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 02:57:35PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > <snip> > Some examples of tags I consider reasonable to auto-reject, because they > should be easy to fix (but many of them should be bug reports anyway): > - binary-file-compressed-with-upx > - copyright-lists-upstream-authors-with-dh_make-boilerplate > - missing-dependency-on-perlapi > - section-is-dh_make-template > > Some examples of tags where I do not consider this reasonable until bugs have > been filed: > - statically-linked-binary > - mknod-in-maintainer-script > - debian-rules-not-a-makefile > - dir-or-file-in-var-www
I tend to agree with you here, though I would suggest keeping all tags as strong rejects for NEW packages, and by NEW, here, I mean *totally* new packages, not those existing source packages that add a new binary package. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
