Andreas Tscharner a écrit : >> On the other hand, Section 10.4 says only "the script name should not >> include an extension". So you can leave the extension for > > What is the intention of this rule anyway?
So I'm not the only one to wonder about this. After digging I've found the following discussion: http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2003/04/msg00031.html which led to the following bugreport: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=190753 which was fixed in version debian-policy/3.7.0.0. I agree with the arguments, but I am not convinced we should diverge from upstream on this topic, by the way. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
