On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:40:35PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article <20090811183800.ge5...@const.famille.thibault.fr> you wrote: > > Not necessarily. Any sane implementation should just use wchar_t > Which could be UTF16 and therefore still has complicatd length semantics.
No, wchar_t is UCS-4 (or UCS-2 in esoteric implementations like Windows). Bastian -- Phasers locked on target, Captain. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
