Gabor Gombas <gomb...@sztaki.hu> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 06:31:59PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> Why would you think the one transition would be helpfull in the second
>> or that there would be less breakage in the second if we do the first
>> one first? I would rather say you are doubling the problems and
>> breakages as the two are completly different mechanisms.
>
> Making the shell selectable means more code than hardcoding a single
> string. More code means more bugs. Since a bug in this case can result
> in an unbootable system, doing things one step at a time so you only
> have to look for bugs in one component at a time makes perfect sense
> IMHO.
>
> Gabor
But having the string hardcoded to /bin/bash or to /bin/dash makes
absolutely no difference later when it comes to making it selectable.
You get exactly the same bugs then and you also get the bugs now for
changing the hardcoded string.
It is not doing things a step at a time. It is taking one step to the
right and then taking a step forward. Steping to the right first
doesn't move you forward at all.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
