[Michael Biebl] > Would it make sense to avoid the upload of "obviously" broken > packages from buildds in the future. E.g. if lintian detects an > error it would need some special inspection from the buildd uploader.
Don't all buildd binary packages already need "special inspection" from a buildd uploader? That was my understanding, anyway: a buildd package is not uploaded until someone reads the build log and takes special action, gpg-signing something or other. (And, yes, the build logs seem to include some 'dpkg --contents' output at the end, so the breakage should have been visible before upload.) -- Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
