On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 01:27:16PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 02:38:47PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > So 'Description' (Subject), 'Bug' (Closes), Signed-Of-By, Origin > > (Author) are already there, some of them already being used by other > > tools (git-dch). Wouldn't it make sense to choose (or at least allow > > for) a format that's compatbile with what git-format-patch generates? > > Why not just fix/change git-format-patch (or create a > git-format-debian-patch) to create a DEP#3 conforming header instead? The current format created by git-format-patch can just be fed to git-am again (which eases work on patch-queue branches) or be send as an email to upstream. We can of course convert from and to a DEP#3 compatible format but why not use something the rest of world uses for exchanging patches? Cheers, -- Guido
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
