On 2009-06-24, Neil Roeth <n...@debian.org> wrote: > I received the below email that my package, aplus-fsf, was removed from > testing. Apparently that is due to the removal of gtk 1.2, but aplus-fsf has > no direct dependency on gtk 1.2. I'm a little surprised at the removal - no > bugs were filed, no lintian error that the package depended on an obsolete > package, etc. Anyway... why exactly it was removed and what needs to happen > to get it back into testing? Below the email are the relevant lines from > http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/neilm. > > > # gtk 1.2 removal, 20090527 > > # Round 3: > > # Round 3: > remove xemacs21/21.4.22-1 gtk+1.2/1.2.10-18.1 toolbar-fancy/0.07-7.1 > aplus-fsf/4.22.1-1
A wild guess would be aplus-fsf-el built from aplus-fsf source package depending on xemacs21-nomule, built from xemacs21 source package. I do agree that you should have been adviced beforehand. >From a quick view, it looks like either dropping the -el package or somehow depending on some other emacs flavour will let aplus-fsf flow back into testing once a new version is 10 days old. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
