On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 07:03:40PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > And after all, debhelper didn't need a DEP at all in order to come into > widespread use, so your worst case scenario could equally well come to pass > without ever going through a public discussion process - there are already a > fair number of formatted debian/copyright files in the wild based on nothing > more than a pretty bad wiki draft...
It feels like half the problem here is that making it a DEP feels much more like something that's being pushed to everyone. If it were going through a similar process to debhelper people would probably feel more comfortable about ignoring it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org