Philipp Kern <tr...@philkern.de> wrote: > On 2009-06-04, Frank Küster <fr...@debian.org> wrote: >> And what would be the criterion for "solved"? After an analysis of >> N build logs of random packages on that buildd show no segfaults any >> more? I am not going to do that. >> >> It's not a bug in my package; I am not going to take responsibility for >> it. > > There are two issues: one that a buildd has random segfaults. That's > sadly common on hppa and ought to be ignored. > > Secondly a package messes up the buildd's chroot on ia64.
You are speaking of #530832, aren't you? So please tell me why some people think that it is tex-common who messes up the buildd's chroot. I have given detailed arguments, multiple times, why I don't think so. Please follow up on that. Please follow up on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=530832#51 or http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=530832#56 after you've read what I wrote there. I'm open to be convinced, but so far no one has been giving any technical arguments. Pissed, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Debian Developer (TeXLive) VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
