Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> writes: > I think not, since there treating a field header as a single > logical line or as a line with continuation lines is conceptually > indistinguishable (I do not think we need to change any code with the > new explanation). […]
> The part that I want to carry on is that conceptually, a field > header is a single line, though it might be distributed over several > physical lines (continuation lines). I don't think the bit about how > unfolding is to be accomplished need go into policy. I don't know what this “field header” is that you're referring to. Do you mean “field”? There's no header involved, only fields, AFAICT. -- \ “I went to court for a parking ticket; I pleaded insanity. I | `\ said ‘Your Honour, who in their right mind parks in the passing | _o__) lane?’” —Steven Wright | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
