Hello Robert, [ I don't read debian-devel, so please Cc: me on or point me to whatever I should read; thanks. ]
* Robert Collins wrote on Thu, May 14, 2009 at 02:31:46AM CEST: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419228 is likely > related. > as is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419228. Duplicate listing of same bug. > and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492220. > None of the bugs above have been forward upstream; Ralf, do you think > they are reasonable candidates to forward, or is more info needed before > we do that? No, somebody should fix 492220. That's a bug introduced or exposed by Debian's changes to Libtool; it doesn't show up upstream. Reporting 419228 doesn't make sense either as long as indirect dependencies are not supported upstream. The testsuite patch from 419228 has been integrated upstream. Cheers, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org