Hello Robert,

[ I don't read debian-devel, so please Cc: me on or point me to whatever
I should read; thanks. ]

* Robert Collins wrote on Thu, May 14, 2009 at 02:31:46AM CEST:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419228 is likely
> related.
> as is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419228.

Duplicate listing of same bug.

> and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492220.

> None of the bugs above have been forward upstream; Ralf, do you think
> they are reasonable candidates to forward, or is more info needed before
> we do that?

No, somebody should fix 492220.  That's a bug introduced or exposed by
Debian's changes to Libtool; it doesn't show up upstream.  Reporting
419228 doesn't make sense either as long as indirect dependencies are
not supported upstream.

The testsuite patch from 419228 has been integrated upstream.

Cheers,
Ralf


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to