Peter Eisentraut <pet...@debian.org> (13/05/2009): > The latter two approaches have obvious flaws, but it seems that no one is > using > the built-in dpkg approach. Is there anything wrong with it? Are people > just > not aware of it?
People might be using the following, which is slightly better than listing every Linux architectures: | Build-Depends: libcap2-dev [!kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386] > Partial answer: pbuilder doesn't support that style yet, so you can't build > packages that way (bug #363193). dpkg folks haven't been advocating their use, either. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
