Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes: > Yes, and the MBF proposal *doesn't* take into account packages that > previously *did* have a hard dep on their doc packages and only > demoted it to a Recommends: once the default behavior changed. > > Cf. swat, samba-doc.
Wouldn't this MBF shake out which packages actually have good reason for a strong (i.e. pulled-in-by-default-package-tool-behaviour) dependency relationship to their docs from those that do not? That seems like a good reason to go through this exercise. -- \ “There is something wonderful in seeing a wrong-headed majority | `\ assailed by truth.” —John Kenneth Galbraith, 1989-07-28 | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
