Le mardi 05 mai 2009 à 17:36 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit : > I have been told by upstream maintainers of one of my packages and by > prominent developers of other distributions that supporting a standalone > /usr is too much work and no other distribution worth mentioning does it > (not Ubuntu, not Fedora, not SuSE).
Just for the record, what kind of issues is it causing? Is it about some libraries needing to lie in /lib? > So, does anybody still see reasons to continue supporting a standalone > /usr? > If you do, please provide a detailed real-world use case. On my laptop, / is an encrypted partition while /usr is not. There is nothing secret in my /usr, while there is in my /etc, and OTOH /usr being unencrypted gives better performance. Frankly, I could live without it. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
