On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Mike Hommey <m...@glandium.org> wrote:
> It unfortunately wouldn't work for the same reason config.{guess,sub} > updates don't work, and more. It would need to be incorporated upstream, > and all debian sources using config.{guess,sub} should be updated to > these newer versions. That sounds like something that's never going to > happen. You don't think upstream would accept the patch? Once they do and the updates trickle down into new upstreams then this will become more and more of a non-issue. Obviously it will be a long time before that happens, probably many years. Here is what I plan to send upstream: cur_v=`echo "$timestamp" | sed s/-//g` for path in \ "$HOME/.config/automake" \ /usr/local/share/automake \ /usr/local/share/misc \ /usr/share/automake \ /usr/share/misc \ ; do if test -x "$path/config.sub" ; then v=`"$path/config.sub" --time-stamp | sed s/-//g` if test "$v" -gt "$cur_v" ; then "$path/config.sub" $* exit $? fi fi done > The best debian can do is enforce dpkg-buildpackage or some other dpkg > binary involved in the source extraction or build startup to replace or > hack the config.{guess,sub} files itself[1] before the build. That was suggested on IRC the other night, sounds like a good solution as long as the buildd admins are notified so that they can file bugs. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org