Le mercredi 15 avril 2009 à 11:44 -0500, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
> > Policy documents practice. When that new /bin/sh exists, you can change
>
> bash is the current /bin/sh, from your statements I could imply that we
> should require all /bin/sh's to support: b0rken bash arrrays, shell
> regexes!, ${RANDOM,HOSTNAME,{E,}UID}, pushd, popd, let, exec -c/-l/-a, ...?> lots of those features are used in the wild, thus "practice." > And taking your statement to the extreme, it means that if zsh was used > as /bin/sh then no other shell interpreter could ever be used as /bin/sh > ever again but a fork of zsh. I’m proposing to do the exact opposite. But I see you are only interested in trolling, not in discussing options. -- .''`. Debian 5.0 "Lenny" has been released! : :' : `. `' Last night, Darth Vader came down from planet Vulcan and told `- me that if you don't install Lenny, he'd melt your brain.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
