Le Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:39:12PM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa a écrit : > > Most of the REJECTs are very trivial, so any peer review helps to spot > them. I'd say that 90% of the REJECTs are simple "the package contains > license X files but X isn't listed in debian/copyright." Spotting > these before the package hits NEW speeds up the process a lot.
Le Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:32:23PM +0100, Romain Beauxis a écrit : > > I would strongly advertise a public collaborative license and copyright check. > That is the kind of work that we could all do and report in the NEW queue. Le Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:33:00PM +0000, James Westby a écrit : > > There seems to be an interest in reviewing things in NEW, but this > is difficult due to NEW policies. Why not simply move the review to > be before NEW? For example, post your packages that will have to go > through NEW to debian-mentors@, requesting a NEW-like check, and > upload when you are satisfied with the reviews that you have. Hi all, Here is a wiki page proposing two parallel workflows for pre- or post-upload peer review. http://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview Have a nice read :) -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
