Manoj Srivastava dijo [Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 09:54:42AM -0500]: > Err, isn't munin a hugely complex beasty, that has to be > configured for the network, and usually lives on a signle machine and > polls others? and does alerting and graphing and is a pain to > configure? On the other hand, netstat -r, netstat -i, netstat -al > just work? > > Am I missing something, since munin is seen as a replacement for > netstat?
Munin is actually a quite simple and extendable framework for centralized infrastructure monitoring, almost trivial to configure (although you can come up with some pretty involved/complicated setups, but for most situations it is quite trivial). It does not support alerting, only monitoring and (offline, static, cron-based) graphing. It is by far not a replacement for netstat - it uses netstat as a source for many of its queries. -- Gunnar Wolf - gw...@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
