On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 09:56:39AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > No, it doesn't. > > If I have a good upstream and am confident that the work has been correctly > licensed, there's no reason for me to go through the software file-by-file > just to double-check this.
As I have been corrected, so apologies are in order. However, there have been times when I have realised after some time that the copyright information in the upstream is woefully incomplete or inaccurate. I had similarly doing blanked declarations in debian/copyright which turned out to be wrong because I had not checked. When I found this, I sent the issue upstream: http://tinyurl.com/ctargs And I was fortunate that they did a massive overhaul and a re-release. Best, -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
