Fabian Greffrath wrote: > However, I think the toolame package in stable may stay both for the > convenience of our users and because it's not *that* bad after all. I > have prepared a package targeted at Lenny that fixes two portability > bugs and some minor lintian warnings. It can be found at mentors.d.n > [1], the debdiff is attached to this mail. Please tell me if or under > which restrictions it is OK to upload it to stable or s-p-u.
It's ok, please mention the portability bugs on [0] and upload. > My general question regarding the removal of toolame is: Should we > provide a transition and if yes... how? I consider the following methods > to deal with this issue: > 2. Provide an empty toolame package that depends on twolame. Preferably in the twolame source package. Cheers Luk [0] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases/5.0.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
