On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:19:40PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > > > I've not looked at this at all - but the idea of shared sockets > > > in /tmp which I recall from a previous message in the thread jumped out > > > at me as being a recipe for symlink attacks, if nothing else. > > [Mike Hommey] > > Screen does that too, so that would hardly be less secure than screen. > > Well, if by "in /tmp" you mean "in /var/run/screen".
Well, that's a Debian thing. Upstream default is /tmp/screens, and last time I checked on RH, it was there too. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org