I demand that Goswin von Brederlow may or may not have written... > joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) writes: [snip] >> Well despite the claims from some people that try to prevent a solution, >> there in fact is only a very minor disagreement.
That would appear to include "despite Schilling's own claims". >> This disagreement is based on the attempt from some people to interpret >> some meaning into the "system exception" that is not in the GPL text. > The "system exception" can not be applied for Debian so whatever > differences there are about interpreting it are completely irrelevant. The > whole clause does not apply. Oh, it can. It applies when it suits Schilling. [1] [snip] > And it still doesn't apply to Debian. So whatever permission to omit > things it gives you is void. It doesn't apply to Debian. Situation normal wrt cdrschillings, then... [1] <49ae61d1.hee70xnryzq1zocn%joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de> -- | Darren Salt | linux or ds at | representing | RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | self only | + RIPA NOTICE: NO CONSENT GIVEN FOR INTERCEPTION OF MESSAGE TRANSMISSION I know what I wrote yesterday. Note to whom this is NOT sent... :-รพ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org