On Mon, Mar 02 2009, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Simon Josefsson dijo [Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:22:52AM +0100]:
>> How about submitting a patch to use help2man instead?
>>
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/help2man/>
>> Then the man page will be kept up to date with --help output.
>>
>> Possibly the document around the man page requirement could point to
>> help2man as a quick solution in case there is useful --help output but
>> no man page.
>
> Hmh, this could even be promoted as a "best packaging practice". Many
> authors do ship properly-formatted --help entries, and our
> hand-generated manpages can often linger behind the truth. Any strong
> opinions against?
I would not call it best. Barely adequate, perhaps. Could do
better, certainly. Best practrice would be to write up a real man
page, perhaps using the help2man as a starting point.
manoj
--
Loan-department manager: "There isn't any fine print. At these interest
rates, we don't need it."
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
