I am the psychotherapist. Please, describe your problems. Each time you are finished talking, type RET twice.
Le vendredi 27 février 2009 11:03:55 Joerg Schilling, vous avez écrit : > John Goerzen <jgoer...@complete.org> wrote: > > > The code that was taken by Debian for the fork WAS free but now it is > > > no longer because Debian did apply changes that are forbidden by law. > > > > When will you enumerate these? > > > > Until you do, I can't see your arguments being taken seriously by anyone. > > As long as Debian hides related Bug reports and as long as Debian continues > to publish slander against me and my software, I cannot see any will to > change the current situation that is 100% a result of activities from some > people that called themself "Debian maintainers". Is it because is 100% a result of activities from some people that called themself debian maintainers that you came to me? > > Explaining the situation in more details, than I did in the open during the > past years already, takes time. Please understand that I am not going to > waste my time with trolls. Does it bother you that you are not going to waste your time with trolls? > Debian as whole did lose any credibility because > of the cdrtools attacks that have been initated by Eduard Bloch and that > have been supported by other Debian people. Are you sure that is the real reason? > If you are seriously interested > to change this situation, give me a strong sign that there is a will at > Debian to get rid of the situation that has been created by Eduard Bloch by > attacking me and my projects in 2004 ..... When did you first know that there is a will at debian to get rid of the situation that has been created by eduard bloch by attacking you and your projects in 2004? > > As I mentioned already: the license change in cdrtools was a _reaction_ on > the attacks run by Eduard Bloch and others. Why do you say that? > The attacks from this person > started in May 2004 as personal attacks and increased over time. Earlier you said is 100% a result of activities from some people that called themself debian maintainers? > I > understand that in bigger associations there is a higher probability to > also have bad people but any assicoation needs to find ways to deal with > problems that result from bad people's actions. Is the fact that in bigger associations there is a higher probability to also have bad people but any assicoation needs to find ways to deal with problems that result from bad people's actions the real reason? > > Are aou interested to change this situation? > Maybe the cdrtools attacks that have been initated by eduard bloch and that have been supported by other debian people have something to do with this. > Jörg > Can you elaborate on that? > -- > EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 > Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) > joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: > http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ > ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily -- Jean Parpaillon - Kerlabs Engineer Bâtiment Germanium 80 avenue des buttes de Coësmes 35700 Rennes - France Tel.: +33 6 80 332 73 85 http://www.kerlabs.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.