On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 09:59:31AM +0100, Arthur Loiret wrote: > > 2009/2/20, Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org>: > > Also unsurprisingly (to me, given my observations that had led to the post > > in the first place), no one else has yet stepped up to be an alpha porter > > for squeeze. > > I am volunteer to apply as alpha porter. I have several alpha machines > of my own, which makes it easy to debug a failure on alpha.
no only due to the demand post release, it is good to rethink the end of life of alpha. > > I've cc:ed everyone who listed themselves as an alpha porter for etch on > > <http://wiki.debian.org/alphaEtchReleaseRecertification>, to make sure > > anyone willing to do the work on alpha for Squeeze has an opportunity to do > > so. But in the absence of some demonstration of committment in the next > > couple of weeks, on March 7 I'll plan to ask the ftp team and the release > > team to drop alpha from the archive for testing and unstable. > > I can provide access to some hardware if anybody else is interested in > contributing to the alpha port. it be cool to have a kernel alpha buildserver so that alpha get autobuild before upload. i'd volounteer in refreshing the config settings for alpha on linux-2.6 side, they haven't seen care for quite some time. kind regards -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org