* Enrico Zini [Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:50:41 +0000]: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:44:16PM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> > I would propose something like freshness of bugs vs. freshness of last > > non-binary upload, possibly weighted. This would let old but > > non-problematic packages off the radar. > I don't have the time to design and test such an algorithm (and I'd have > to also brush up my statistics), but if anyone else wants to try and see > how it goes, that's fine to me. There was something akin to this (though targetted at spotting orphaning / removal candidates rather than just to assess the liveness of a package): http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/bapase Not sure if that continues to be active or not. Bcc'ing bap...@qa.debian.org in case they want to comment. Context is: > If anyone can suggest me a decent heuristics to spot a 'rotting' package > (like, for example standards-version older than X, but you need to tell > me what X), I can automatically mine it and turn it into a debtags tag. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org A hacker does for love what other would not do for money. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
