On Mon, Feb 09 2009, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> [...]
>> c. his means there will be no need for /etc/kernel-img.conf file any
>> more.
>
> [...]
>
> Isn't this file also read in the postinst of the "official" kernels?
> In FAI we had several issues when kernel-img.conf was missing or
> hadn't had the proper values in there.
I think that is a carry over from the days when the official
kernels were based on kernel-package. I am given to understand that is
not how things are supposed to work post lenny.
In any case, I guess what I meant to say was that images created
by kernel-package will stop paying attention to /etc/kernel-img.conf,
and thus there will be no reason to keep that file for the sake of
kernel-package images. kernel-package shall also stop creating the file
if it does not exist.
Another thing going away is the on-th-fly patching of the
sources; the preferred way to patch the sources will be to do so
outside of make-kpkg, before invoking the make-kpkg script to package
the kernel images.
All that convoluted code excised from kernel-package ought to
improve robustness.
manoj
--
Love may laugh at locksmiths, but he has a profound respect for money
bags. Sidney Paternoster, "The Folly of the Wise"
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
