Bernd Eckenfels <e...@lina.inka.de> writes: > In article <87d4enbfqd....@mocca.josefsson.org> you wrote: >> It would establish an upper bound of well-administrated debian machines, >> I think. > > It is a lower bound, since I guess there are more cases where more than one > machine is updated. The case that you download without need or as a > duplicate (With multiple IPs) is very low.
I've realized it is not a lower bound either, because some download s.d.o packages to temporary chroots and pbuilds etc which should probably not be counted as a debian machine. Still, trying to get numbers on the various statistics we can easily get at may improve estimates and allow us to follow the trends. /Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
